[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: throwing out perfectly good trains and trams
- Subject: Re: throwing out perfectly good trains and trams
- From: billboltonREMOVE-TO-EMAIL@computer.org (Bill Bolton)
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2000 22:36:58 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Telstra BigPond Internet Services (http://www.bigpond.com)
- References: <3944BFA4.874B6631@ozemail.com.au> <4ABB7BA22263014E.1E3AF62C7AE617D0.58D09D4E7E052CBE@lp.airnews.net>
- Reply-To: billboltonREMOVE-TO-EMAIL@computer.org (Bill Bolton)
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:12816
"Dave Proctor" <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> Although I tend to agree with him in a lot of his points (scary, isn't it!).
> Tangaras are newer than K-sets, yet K-sets are far more comfrotable.
If you just measure seating, perhaps, but "comfort" is a meausre of a
bunch of factors, not just seats.
Cheers,
Bill