[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: electric loco 4501 or 7001

Subject: Re: electric loco 4501 or 7001
From: ROY HOWARTH <rhowarth@ihug.com.au>
Date: 16 Jun 2000 11:28:22 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: The Internet Group (Sydney)
References: <39474F03.B3ECCFB6@enet21.com.au> <8i90uu$mmh$1@gossamer.itmel.bhp.com.au> <CsU15.29$re6.398911@news0.optus.net.au> <3948A233.5E794DDB@enet21.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:12367

erm...have you looked inside it lately??

Roy H

chris <chris@enet21.com.au> wrote:
>I had thought it was kinda complete, as I heard a story that it wouldn't take
>much to get it going again except the will of the RTM's management.
>
>Chris
>
>David Bromage wrote:
>
>> Chris Stratton (stratton.chris.cp@bhp.com.au) wrote:
>> > Last time I looked at 7100 at Thirlmere it was an empty box on wheels so I
>> > think it would be quite a bit of work to get it going again.
>>
>> Even when it was a full box on wheels it took quite a bit of work to get
>> it going again!
>>
>> Cheers
>> David
>

References:
- electric loco 4501 or 7001
  - From: chris <chris@enet21.com.au>
- Re: electric loco 4501 or 7001
  - From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
- Re: electric loco 4501 or 7001
  - From: chris <chris@enet21.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Signal Failure @ East Hills Line!!!
Next by Date: Re: electric loco 4501 or 7001
Prev by thread: Re: electric loco 4501 or 7001
Next by thread: Re: electric loco 4501 or 7001
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread