[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PL??
Michael Kurkowski (usenet.spam@gunzel.net) wrote:
> richard_snook@primus.com.au (Richard) wrote in
> <39371E3F.8AEFB3B7@primus.com.au>:
> >OK they are Port Link locos...similar to AN's DA apparently
> >
> >> I get the idea a PL is some sort of rebuilt or modified 48???? anyone
> >> furbish more details...just curious!!
> Correct, the PL is a rebuilt 48. It seemed as though that the decision was
> the short hood behind the cab wasn't needed any more, so it got chopped.
> the DA's in SA are a similar concept, but using the 830 class.
The PLs have a form of Locotrol which the DAs don't.
> As far as I
> know, one of the DA's is actualy a former 48 (possibly DA5?)
DA7 was 4813.
DA1 was 849
DA2 was 832
DA3 was 835
DA4 was 839
DA5 was 875 (which was 830)
DA6 was 836
Cheers
David
- References:
- Re: PL??
- From: Richard <richard_snook@primus.com.au>
- Re: PL??
- From: usenet.spam@gunzel.net (Michael Kurkowski)