Re: Safeworking on single lines

["emd567" <emd567@hinet.net.au>]

Thats why a following train is issued with a (SWF S3111?) "Notice of Train
Ahead" form when the train in front hasn't cleared the section.

--
On the south Danny


"Derick Wuen" <cullend@webone.com.au> wrote in message
news:38b87790@iridium.webone.com.au...
>
> David Johnson wrote in message <38B7CD43.F821C4B0@ozemail.com.au>...
> >Derick Wuen wrote:
> >
> >> In some cases a time interval was silly (e.g. for short sections) and
not
> >> sdpecified in the WTT.
> >
> >Like Junee North to Junee West?
>
>
> That's the sort of thing, but I have not checked this one specifically.
> >
> >> I can't recall a "follow-on" prang (rsender?) under these regulations
> being
> >> documented.
> >
> >Remembering of course that if the leading train was to fail, the time
> interval
> >would be sufficient to protect the rear.
>
>
> Now that you remind me, yes. Us amateurs often overlook the detonators and
> flags.
>
> Of coarse when OTS&T was designed, all trains had guards, and one of their
> functions was rear-end protection.
>
> >
> >--
> >David Johnson
> >trainman@ozemail.com.au
> >http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
> >------------------------------------
> >These comments are made in a private
> >capacity and do not represent the
> >official view of State Rail.
> >C.O.W.S. Page 11.
> >
> >
>
>



* This message via Spectrum Networks - Internet End to End (02) 9221 3006