[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: QR and Photographers
- Subject: Re: QR and Photographers
- From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 21:53:07 +1100
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- References: <38845b64@grissom> <er9h4.53$pe4.464338@news0.optus.net.au> <86ats9$t5i$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <26f15c5e.25e8d75c@usw-ex0102-010.remarq.com> <3889AF48.A5CC1CB9@ozemail.com.au> <86dit1$l7s$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <04d17460.3d4450ce@usw-ex0102-010.remarq.com> <388AD71D.EA91D320@ozemail.com.au> <0f5b83e7.c9b216b9@usw-ex0102-010.remarq.com> <388BB58D.EF37155B@mailbox.uq.edu.au> <01bf68ae$a3d66c00$ec0e65cb@nadnerb2000> <12ea1f1c.db37a579@usw-ex0102-013.remarq.com> <01bf6b1c$ce520000$c34265cb@nadnerb2000>
- Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au
Brendan wrote:
> I understand what you mean, but what I was referring to was organised
> graffiti. If this were elsewhere, this would be art.
>
> And think about it. Some graffiti is considered historic and valuable. Many
> places wera with pride 50+ year old graffiti.
There is graffiti on the wall in the bomb shelters at St James dating back to
the war. I personally think graffiti is ugly, and heavy fines should befall
offenders.
--
David Johnson
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
------------------------------------
These comments are made in a private
capacity and do not represent the
official view of State Rail.
C.O.W.S. Page 11.