[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Yet another Sydney derailment
- Subject: Re: Yet another Sydney derailment
- From: "chris@enet21.com.au" <chris@enet21.com.au>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2000 20:09:32 +1100
- Newsgroups: aus.rail,misc.transport.rail.australia-nz
- Organization: Customer of Connect.com.au Pty. Ltd.
- References: <h9nl7s4pnp7fq8ipp7john73q1j3druhe2@4ax.com> <85f1jd$2ufs$1@otis.netspace.net.au> <387B2C8E.CD7B5251@where.com> <85gffm$5ce$1@lios.apana.org.au> <85is05$809$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <85n4d6$iue$1@lios.apana.org.au> <85o0la$8vj$2@news1.mpx.com.au> <3881c44b@pink.one.net.au> <870fla$srk$1@news1.mpx.com.au> <01bf6bb0$bc896400$970d65cb@nadnerb2000>
They (the cops) would take action if it affected them. To find out email them
defamatory messages.
Let me know how you go..
Brendan wrote:
> Whoops.
>
> Dave Proctor <thadocta@spambait.dingoblue.net.au> wrote in article
> <870fla$srk$1@news1.mpx.com.au>...
> > Nobody wrote in message <3881c44b@pink.one.net.au>...
> > >Not necessarily. Saying something you shouldnt have said can be illegal
> in
> > >most cases. In this case, if the affected person found out about the
> > >defamation, he could contact police, who would then trace the server of
> > the
> > >poster and charge him with libel (printing or recording a defamatory
> > >article). Particularly if it harms him.
> >
> > ROFL - police charge with libel? Ok, if you say so.
> >
> > The police are only interested in crimes. Libel is tortious (tort = civil
> > wrong) and the policeprobably could not give a rats backside about it.
> >
> > Dave
> >
> >
> >