Re: Carlingford

["keith malcolm" <kmalcolm@tpg.com.au>]

I would have thought that is why the service was more frequent. The packs
got separated, and it seemed like there was a more frequent service than
there really was. I could be wrong though. I thought I was once, until I
realised I'd made a mistake.

Dave Malcolm

Daniel Bowen <dbowen@custard.REMOVE.net.au> wrote in message
5kB06.28743$xW4.222415@news-server.bigpond.net.au">news:5kB06.28743$xW4.222415@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
> When we get bus substitutions at my station occasionally (Glenhuntly in
> Melbourne), they run at the same frequency as the trains, but in packs of
6!
>
>
> Daniel
> --
> Daniel Bowen, Melbourne, Australia
> dbowen@custard.REMOVE.net.au
> Melbourne public transport FAQ http://www.custard.net.au/melbtrans/
>
>
> "Marvin The Martian" <choochoo72@spin.net.au> wrote in message
> 3A42CB34.1E880F4C@spin.net.au">news:3A42CB34.1E880F4C@spin.net.au...
> > I remember a few years ago when they rebuilt the bridge on the
Carlingford
> > they ran buses for a month. The passengers were annoyed when the trains
> came
> > back as the buses were more frequent
> >
> > David Johnson wrote:
> >
> > > The rumour department states that the Carlingford line will be
> permanently
> > > closed shortly, with buses substituting to allow construction work for
> the
> > > chatswood line.
> > >
> > > --
> > > David Johnson
> > > trainman@ozemail.com.au
> > > http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
> > > ------------------------------------
> > > These comments are made in a private
> > > capacity and do not represent the
> > > official view of State Rail.
> > > C.O.W.S. Page 11.
> >
>
>