[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [SA] Jumbo question (TransAdelaide)

Subject: Re: [SA] Jumbo question (TransAdelaide)
From: dbromage@fang.omni.com.au (David Bromage)
Date: Tue, 05 Dec 2000 22:47:42 GMT
Newsgroups: aus.rail
Organization: CWO Customer - reports relating to abuse should be sent to abuse@cwo.net.au
References: <9099kq$v4$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <3A2B56F1.321325CD@senet.com.au> <3A2CD6B7.35993789@enternet.com.au>
Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:26235

Chris Brownbill (cbrnbill@enternet.com.au) wrote:
> The 2000's are not, have never been, and were never intended to be country
> trains.  There are no toilets, and the seating layouts are very definitely
> suburban.

The internal layout has little to do with the intended service. The design
of the engine and shell shows their intended use.

Remember that they are based on the Prospector.

Cheers
David

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [SA] Jumbo question (TransAdelaide)
  - From: Chris Brownbill <cbrnbill@enternet.com.au>

References:
- [SA] Jumbo question (TransAdelaide)
  - From: "James C." <james_ccj@my-deja.com>
- Re: [SA] Jumbo question (TransAdelaide)
  - From: MiCRiC <slagel@senet.com.au>
- Re: [SA] Jumbo question (TransAdelaide)
  - From: Chris Brownbill <cbrnbill@enternet.com.au>

Prev by Date: Re: Probe into coal train near miss
Next by Date: Re: Why not monorail?
Prev by thread: Re: [SA] Jumbo question (TransAdelaide)
Next by thread: Re: [SA] Jumbo question (TransAdelaide)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread