[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Australian suburban services (was: [NSW] V sets)
- Subject: Re: Australian suburban services (was: [NSW] V sets)
- From: David Johnson <trainman@ozemail.com.au>
- Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2000 14:27:35 +1000
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- References: <Ghak5.3287$gg.9211@news1.rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <8msai3$54q$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <pKjk5.3307$gg.9462@news1.rivrw1.nsw.optushome.com.au> <3991d204@news.iprimus.com.au> <399294B3.537A8D49@ozemail.com.au> <3992978B.3CF118FB@ozemail.com.au> <399326d1@news.iprimus.com.au> <3993ADA8.53AC92B8@ozemail.com.au> <IFSk5.83292$N4.2067811@ozemail.com.au>
- Reply-To: trainman@ozemail.com.au
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:15856
Barry Campbell wrote:
> James Brook wrote in message <3993ADA8.53AC92B8@ozemail.com.au>...
> >I haven't been there for a few years (1995 I think). It must have gone
> >downhill since then. But of course, TransAdelaide don't seem to have as
> >many accidents as CityRail.
> >
> The Hobart suburban service has got the accident situation down to a fine
> art. They haven't had an accident since 1960 something.
Adelaide is trying to follow the same philosophy.
--
David Johnson
trainman@ozemail.com.au
http://www.ozemail.com.au/~trainman/
------------------------------------
These comments are made in a private
capacity and do not represent the
official view of State Rail.
C.O.W.S. Page 11.