[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (NSW) Set classification
- Subject: Re: (NSW) Set classification
- From: paulrw@xa2.com.au (paul)
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 08:56:14 GMT
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: @Home Network
- References: <01bf9701$def19900$6c6f868b@tom-boles> <38DF14FD.839EAAE9@ihug.com.au> <01bf97d8$d38b11e0$ef6d868b@tom-boles> <38E06E6F.83D0D528@fastlink.com.au> <01bf9899$b9e3de40$fc6f868b@tom-boles> <38E198F6.1D7515AD@fastlink.com.au> <L2hE4.1316$HQ5.647152@news0.optus.net.au>
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:6956
>I wonder how the original K's got that letter - they were changed to K sets
>when the whole set had P/A systems fitted.
>
Because they replaced F sets, and there are some warped senses of
humour in the railways.
Instead of seeing F you see K.
(sorry something came over me)
paul x is the spam filter