[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Gunnedah shire pushes Melbourne-Darwin rail line
- Subject: Re: Gunnedah shire pushes Melbourne-Darwin rail line
- From: pcc@ocean.com.au (Brown Family)
- Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 03:12:20 GMT
- Newsgroups: aus.rail
- Organization: Customer of Connect.com.au Pty. Ltd.
- References: <s1EE4.1387$zV3.657476@news0.optus.net.au> <38e43485_1@news.chariot.net.au> <mdaly1.392.38E44CE6@tpg.com.au> <38E493B4.2CFD@freemail.com.au> <FJfF4.1306$9k5.541305@news0.optus.net.au> <38E73B75.5FBB@freemail.com.au> <mdaly1.413.38E87C10@tpg.com.au>
- Xref: bclass.spectrum.com.au aus.rail:5365
On Mon, 3 Apr 2000 11:10:09 GMT, mdaly1@tpg.com.au (Maurie Daly)
wrote:
>David , in this country we have dozens of railway lines that are available for
>traffic.
>Melb - Sydney is available for traffic, but carries so little that if this
>line had to be built today by the private sector ,it would not be viable.
>The same goes for just about every other railway line in Australia with the
>exception of the Pilbara Lines,and the coal lines in NSW and Qld.
>These lines are the only ones that carry enuf freight to generate sufficient
>revenue in track access fees to cover the capital cost of the line plus the
>interest on the capital.
>For Railway lines which are to carry general contestable freight,they will
>need to be Govt funded or very generous concessions have to be made to any
>private builder.
>
Maurie, if we were ever going to (re)build Melbourne - Sydney, then,
IMO, one thing is for certain; the line would be extremely viable. if
built on a new and faster alignment through Canberra, rather than the
old meandering steam-age one. If the VFT can pass muster on economic
viability, plus other cost benefits such as environmental and
ecological, then certainly a modern alignment should at least do just
as well.
Les Brown
Freedom's just another word for nothin' left to loose.