Re: Cityrail Bashing #3

["Chris Downs" <cvdowns@ozemail.com.au>]

And an extremely simple system of course.  Two pairs of through lines where
services without conflicting movements.  Melbourne and Sydney would perform
equally well with such abundant infrastructure for their respective
passenger loadings.

Chris

Dave Proctor <daproc@spambait.ozemail.com.au> wrote in message
news:1KiG4.142$d67.682658@news0.optus.net.au...
>
> Sam Eades wrote in message <38E9AD11.FC220A62@yahoo.com>...
> >
> >
> >Dave Proctor wrote:
> >
> >> Eric Cartman wrote in message <8cc871$7mb$1@nnrp1.deja.com>...
> >> >What rail system in Australia doesn't need "fine tuning"?
> >>
> >> Perth?
> >
> >All they need is a few more lines!
>
> True, but what is there is fantastic. 15 minute frequencies on all lines,
> good connections, fast services just about always on time. Amazing what
you
> can do with a totally new system, isn't it!
>
> (All right, I know the tracks are not totally new, but the rest is).
>
> Dave
>
>