[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Inaugural IP locos
- To: "'Aus loco discussion mailing list'" <Ausloco@listbot.com>
- Subject: RE: Inaugural IP locos
- From: Peter Donaghy <PeterDo@als.com.au>
- Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 11:35:27 +1000
- Delivered-To: mailing list Ausloco@listbot.com
- Mailing-List: ListBot mailing list contact Ausloco-help@listbot.com
- Reply-To: "Aus loco discussion mailing list" <Ausloco@listbot.com>
Aus loco discussion mailing list
would they have required all three units "on line"? Could the GMs have
been idling, the CL taking the lead "for show"?
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: m,hardacre [mailto:hardacre@acay.com.au]
Sent: Friday, 17 March 2000 12:32 PM
To: Aus loco discussion mailing list
Subject: Re: Inaugural IP locos
Grahame Fergus posted that in the inaugural westbound IP ex Pt. Pirie,
GM 47
would have to be the middle unit. I intend to agree as it stands to
reason
that GM25 (without it's MU connections on the No.1 end) would have real
difficulty being the middle unit. "The Recorder", however, states that
the
train departed Pt. Pirie as CL1+GM25+GM47. I would suspect that it may
be a
case of incorrect reporting over 30 years ago.
Regards,
Mark
______________________________________________________________________
To unsubscribe, write to Ausloco-unsubscribe@listbot.com
______________________________________________________________________
Start Your Own FREE Email List at http://www.listbot.com